2012 Community Improvement Project Rankings
Final CIP Rankings and Award Amounts
The rankings and suggested fund allocations shown below below were voted on by the VNC Board at its 1/17/2012 Board Meeting. At the meeting, the Board voted to accept the rankings and funding amounts recommended by the Neighborhood Committee.
|
Rank |
Applicant |
Project |
Amount Requested |
Amount Allocated |
|
1 |
Mark Twain Middle School |
Mark Twain Ringers |
3,000 |
3,000 |
|
2 |
Broadway Elementary School |
Outdoor Classroom |
3,000 |
3,000 |
|
3 |
Boys & Girls Sewing Club |
Sewing Club |
2,000 |
1,000 |
|
4 |
Venice Library |
Venice Library Collection |
3,000 |
2,000 |
|
5 |
Mildred Cursh Foundation |
Spring Job Fair |
3,000 |
2,000 |
|
6 |
Westside Global Awareness Magnet |
Westside Magnet Spring Fling |
1,000 |
700 |
|
7 |
Westminster Elementary School |
Beautification & Bulletin Board |
3,000 |
1500 |
|
8 |
Marwin Mograbi |
Music United |
1,400 |
|
|
9 |
Unspoken Projects |
Traid Screen Printing Workshop |
1,460 |
|
|
10 |
Venice 2000 |
Vera Davis Center Cleanup |
3,000 |
|
|
11 |
Martin Katon |
Katon Art Opus Venice |
800 |
|
|
12 |
Very Venice Art & Design Galleries |
Very Venice Surfboards |
3,000 |
|
|
13 |
Sonjia Gust |
Lincoln Blvd Cleanup |
2,350 |
|
|
14 |
Chrysalis |
Chrysalis-Venice Beach Partnership |
2,999 |
|
|
15 |
Venice Walk Street Association |
Millwood-Oakwood Roundabout |
1,909 |
|
|
16 |
Bahar Budizadegan |
Unity To Diversity |
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
Total Awarded |
|
13,200 |
These rankings were arrived at following an extensive review process. The applications were initially scanned by staff to verify that they met the program requirements. The budget pages were then reviewed by the Budget Committee to assure that proposed project expenditures would be payable under City of Los Angeles guidelines. The applications were subsequently evaluated by the Neighborhood Committee using the following criteria, as stated in the application packet:
1. The budget is realistic, appropriate, and supported with quotes.
2. The organization or individual is capable of completing the project.
3. The work plan is detailed, specific, and feasible.
4. The project is supported by the community.
5. The number of Venice stakeholders that will benefit from this project is realistic.
6. The project implementation process will build community.
7. The completed project will enhance the community.
The recommended rankings and funding were unanimously approved by the Neighborhood Committee on January 4, 2012.
All applicants were invited to make a short (2 minute) presentation of their projects at the VNC Board meeting on Tuesday, January 17, 2012. After the presentations, the Board voted to approve the rankings as presented by the Neighborhood Committee.
Click www/VeniceNC.org/Neighborhood/CIP to view the application that was used for 2012 projects.
- 319 reads

